Select the best answer from the options. The increasing complexity and global nature of wildlife poaching threaten the survival of many species around the world and are outpacing conservation efforts. In this article, we analyze the proximal and distal factors, both social and ecological, that drive the illegal killing or poaching of large carnivores in places where it is possible to occur. Through this review, we developed a conceptual framework of the socio-ecological system that relates many of the factors that influence the poaching of large carnivores.
Unlike most conservation action models, an important attribute of our framework is the integration of multiple factors related to human motivations and animal vulnerability into feedback. We applied our framework to two case studies, the tigers of Laos and the wolverines of northern Sweden, to demonstrate their usefulness in unraveling some of the complex characteristics of carnivore poaching that may have prevented effective responses to the current poaching crisis. Our framework provides a common platform to help guide future research on the effects of poaching on wildlife, something that until now has not been sufficient, in order to effectively inform policymaking and implementation. Poaching poses a threat to elephants, rhinoceroses and other animals, as well as to smaller and unknown creatures, such as lizards and the monkeys.
In addition, prohibiting the possession or importation of equipment that facilitates the illegal killing of wildlife (e.g., ecological security) refers to the concept of climate change, wildlife crime and biodiversity loss as security issues. Human accessibility and activities in areas with wildlife can increase the ease with which potential poachers can find and dispatch animals (Kerley et al. Southern California is an example of a great center for the trade and distribution of wildlife and its parts. Individual factors of people and wildlife can interact and feed back to influence poaching.
Illegal wildlife trade is not the same as wildlife trafficking, but is considered a component of illegal wildlife trafficking. As with most of the major problems found at the intersection of social and environmental contexts, the framework suggests the high probability of feedback occurring between systems of interactions between people and wildlife. Wildlife confiscation refers to stopping wildlife trafficking by intercepting traffickers and releasing all animals or animal parts. that are in your power.
In addition, social, economic and ecological conditions affect the behavior of individual, human and wild actors. IFAW is working with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, the Association of Zoos and Aquariums and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife to establish a confiscation network to recover illegally traded wildlife. Cybercrime against wildlife comes in many forms, including buying and selling animals and animal parts online, organizing illegal activities, and exchanging money for the purpose of capturing or killing animals. Not only do these problems threaten wildlife and plants, but they also threaten the safety of people, communities, and entire nations.
As soon as you enter a highway, so do hunters and weapons from outside, and wildlife flows quickly and cheaply to distant cities, where it is sold directly or linked to world markets via ships and planes. Pay for performance changes human behavior by eliminating moral hazard and reducing motivation to poach by altering behavioral and regulatory beliefs regarding conservation of wolverines.
